An Epistemological Critique of Islam

This project asks a single question: does Islam, as a system of divine guidance, give people sufficient and reliable means to know it? It is not intended as an emotional or ideological attack on religion, but as an examination of the foundations of religious knowledge. A philosophical inquiry into whether Islam, as a system of divine guidance, provides reliable means of knowing itself. It argues that understanding Islam in practice depends on historical sources that cannot be certain, and asks what that uncertainty means for claims of divine clarity.

The central argument is that the closer one comes to Islam as it is actually practised (its law, rituals and history), the more it depends on tradition and historical sources, and the less certain those sources become. Part One asks whether the Qur'an alone is sufficient, and how much its meaning depends on historical context and interpretation. Part Two looks at the problem of historical knowledge itself: how memory reconstructs events, how oral transmission changes stories, the long gap between the life of Muhammad and the earliest written sources, contradictions between reports, and the different histories held by Sunni and Shia Islam. Part Three considers the philosophical consequences: whether Islam can be known with certainty, and whether a wise God would send an unclear message.

This article has not been published yet.